Myelographic Findings Prior To The Era Of 3-D Imaging In Enugu. A Review With Reappraisal Of Current Myelographic Indications

Main Article Content

S. O. Mgbor
A. C. Imo

Abstract

To conduct a retrospective review of the i n d i c a t i o n s , c l i n i c a l d a t a a n d myelographic appearances. Also to reappraise the current indications of myelography in clinical practice. The request forms, case materials, plain films, myelographic, surgical and
histological findings on 227 patients who underwent non-fluoroscopic water soluble myelography for various forms of spinal disease were collected, analysed and reviewed. Of the 227 myelograms done, 55 (24.2%) were normal while 172(74.8%) were abnormal. The pathological states which were demonstrated by myelography include disk prolapse 76(34.2%); spondylosis 50(22.5%), spinal tumours
41(22.5%), spinal stenosis 19(8.6%), spinal traumatic sequelae 14(6.3%) spondylolisthesis 8(3.6%), congenital malformations (spinal dysraphisms) 4(1.8%). The indications for myelography have continued to shrink both in number and value especially in the developed world following the debut of the 3-Dimensional modalities like computer Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radionucleide Studies (RN). This fact, notwithstanding, water-soluble myelography still has an important place in the investigative strategy of spinal pathology in certain circumstances and climes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

Author Biography

S. O. Mgbor, Department Of Radiation Medicine University Of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu.

Department Of Radiologic Imaging Hansa Clinics, Enugu

How to Cite

Mgbor, S. O., & Imo , A. C. (2025). Myelographic Findings Prior To The Era Of 3-D Imaging In Enugu. A Review With Reappraisal Of Current Myelographic Indications. West African Journal of Radiology, 8(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.82235/wajr.vol8no1.128

References

1. Turgut Tali E, Spinal Infections. European Journal of Radiology, Editorial 2004; 50:111.

2 Sutton D. A text book of radiology and imaging Churchill Living stone, Edinburgh 1988; 1739-1801.

3. Levine HL, Olmstead EJ . Myelographic evaluation of nontraumatic spinal canal obstruction: a new approach Am. J. Roentg 1979; 135: 713 718.

4. Majda Thurner. Spinal Imaging European Journal of Radiology, Editorial 2004; 50: 111.

5. Bouchez B, Arnott G, Delfosse Jm: Acute spinal Epidural abscess J. Neurol. 1985; 231: 3434.

6. Danner RL, Hartmann BJ Update of spinal epidural abscess: 35 cases and review of the literature. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1987; 9: 265 74.

7. Cammisa FP, Eismont FJ, Green BA.: Dural laceration occurring with Durst fractures and associated lamina fractures. J Bone Joint Strg 71 A: 1989; 1044-1052.

8. Miihlbauer R, Eichler K, Der Urban and Fischer (Elsevier) Verlag München Radiologie in Frage Und Antwort 2004; Auflage 1, Kapitel 3,1 seite 29.

9. Keenen TL, Anthony J, Benson DR. Dural tears associated with lumbar burst fractures. J. Orthop Trauma 1990; 4:243-245.

10. Miller CA, Dewey RC, Hunt WE. Impaction fracture of the lumbar vertebral dural tear. J. neurosurg 1980; 53:765 771.

11. Jumah KB, Puplampu B, Review of myelograms in evaluation ofspinal lesions prior to advent of Computed Tomography (CT) scanning in Ghana. West Africa Journal of Medicine 1990; 18: 29-32.

12. Van Goethen JWM, Vanden Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O, De Schepper AMA, Parizeal PM 2004; Spinal Tumors; Euro Journal Radiol. 2004; 50; 159-176.

13. Daffner RH. Evaluation of cervical vertebral injuries, Roentgenology 1991: 27: 231-235.

14. Sortland O, Magnaes B, Hange T. Functional Myelography with metrizamide in diagnosis of lumba canal stenosis, Acta, Radiol. 1977; (Suppl), 355: 42-54.

15. Umerah BC Radiological patterns of Spinal Tuberculosis in the African; East African Med. Journal S1977; Volume 54, No. 11.

16. Lindahl, S. Nyman RS, Brismar J, Hugosson C, Lundstedt C, Imaging of Tuberculosis IV spinal manifestations in 63 patients, Acta Radiologica 1996; 37: 506-511.

17. Skalpe 0I, Bonneville JF et al, Myelography with Dimeric (iodixanol) and a monomeric (Iohexol) contrast medium a multicentric comparative study; European Radiology 1996 8 No 6; 1954 1057.