Amoebic Liver Abscess: Sonographic Patterns And Complications In Enugu, Nigeria

Main Article Content

Dr.
C. I. Eke
A. C. Onuh

Abstract

This study evaluated the sonographic patterns and complications of amoebic liver abscess (ALA) in Enugu, Nigeria. Request forms, case notes, sonographic reports and images of all patients who had amoebic liver abscess diagnosed at Hansa Clinics Enugu and at the UNTH Enugu within a period of 8 months of 2001 were reviewed. Sonograms obtained were analyzed for size, shape, location, echocharacteristics and complications. Of 3700 abdominal ultra sound examinations done, 62 (1.7%) cases of ALA were identified during the review period. Of these, 5(8%) were females and 57(92%) males. Their ages ranged between 19 and 78 years. The echopatterns encountered in 86 abscess cavities, were echorich in 48 abscesses (58%); echopoor and anechoic in 13 (17. 4%) and mixed or inhomogenously hypoechoic in 25 (29.6%) of the abscesses. 18 patients had 21 ALA complications sonographically. These were 3 jaundice, 3 Ascitis, 2 subhepatic effusion, 1 heterotopic splenic abscess, 1 extraperitioneal rupture, 1 intraperitioneal rupture, 3 subphrenic abscess and 7 pleuropulmonary complications. Untreated complicated hepatic amoebic abscesses are associated with high
morbidity and mortality and should receive urgent medical intervention. Sonography remains a veritable tool in the timely investigation of right upper quadrant abdominal pain especially in areas of endemic amoebiasis. Its application would reduce morbidity and mortality of ALA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Mgbor, S. O., Eke, C. I., & Onuh, A. C. (2025). Amoebic Liver Abscess: Sonographic Patterns And Complications In Enugu, Nigeria. West African Journal of Radiology, 10(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.82235/wajr.vol10no1.132

References

1. Palmer P, Reader M, The Radiology of Tropical diseases 1981; Pp: 1- 41.

2. Njoya I, Ndam EC, Ngoue V, Sende CN. Amoebic Liver Abscesses in Yaounde. Sante 1999; 9 (2):119-122

3. Dick R, Textbook of Radiology and imaging edited by David Sutton, 6th Edition pg 990, 1012.

4. Pleorde JJ Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 8th Edition. 214: Pg 1066-1071

5. R. Knight. Oxford Textbook of Medicine (1998). 2nd edition 5 467-474

6. Adams EB, Macleod IN. Invasive Amoebiasis I Amebic dysentery and its complications II Amoebic Abscess and its complications Medicine.

Baltimore.1977; 56. 315-323; 325-334.

7. Ibarra-Perez C. Thoracic complications of amebic abscess of the liver. Report of 501 cases. Chest. 1981; 79: 672-677.

8. Roy D C, Ravindran P & Padmanabhan R. Bronchobiliary fistula secondary to amoebic liver abscess. Chest. (1972); 62: 523.

9. Gupta RK, Pant CS, Parkash R, Behl P, Swaroop K Sonography incomplicated hepatic amoebic abscess. Clinical Radiology 1987; 38(2): 123-126.

10. Abdelouafi A, Ousehal A, Ouzidane L, Kadiri R. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of liver abscesses. Apropos of 32 cases. Ann Radiol 1993; 36(4): 286-292

11. Sharma MP, Dasarathy S, Sushma S, Verma N. Long term follow-up of amoebic liver abscess. Clinical and ultrasound patterns of resolution.

Tropical Gastroenterology. 1995; 16(3): 24-28

12. Shamsuzzaman SM; Hashiguchi Y. Thoracic amoebiasis. Clinical Chest Medicine. 2002; 23(2): 476-492

13. Yinnon AM, Hadas-Halper I, Shapiro M, Hershko C. The changing clinical spectrum of liver abscesses: The Jerusalem experience. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 1994; 70(824): 436-439

14. Leonetti P, Moncanny G, Soubeyrand J. Amoebic abscess of the liver. Contribution of ultrasonics to developmental diagnosis apropos of

983 cases. Journal of Radiology 1987; 68(4): 259-264

15. Stoopen M, Kimura K, Amoebiasis: The technology of the 80's 1. Ultrasound, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance: have they helped improve the diagnosis of hepatic abscess? Rev. Gastroenterol 1989; 54(3): 167-175

16. Joshi VR, Kapoor DP, Purohit AN, Nathwani AN & Lele RD. Jaundice in amoebic abscess of the liver. Journal of Association of Physicians of India. 1972; 20: 761-762