The state of Radiology subspecialty Training in the West African subregion: The Residents’ Perspective
Article Sidebar
Views | PDF/EPUB Downloads:
10
/ 2
/ 2
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background/aim: Radiology residency was initiated nearly 30 years ago in the West African subregion, but accompanying formal subspecialty training has been developed within the 30 year time span. In contrast, subspecialization has evolved over the past 25 years in developed countries. The aim of this study was to determine residents’ perspective about radiology subspecialization training in West Africa.
Materials and Methods: Semi-structured, self-administered electronic questionnaires were sent to residents at different levels of training via E-mail and during update courses. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 15.0 (IBM) package. Quantitative variables were expressed using summary statistics including means and medians. Descriptive analysis was performed for the qualitative variables using frequencies, proportions, and charts. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level using two tailed P values.
Results: There were 117 respondents 85 (72.6%) males and 32 (27.4%) females. A total of 110 (94%) were aware of the various subspecialties in radiology with neuroradiology being identified by all as separate subspecialty. Interventional radiology topped the choice of subspecialty with 61 (52.1%) respondents, and 67 (57.3%) would prefer that subspecialties be introduced in phases. Ultrasound, basic X-ray, mamography equipment, and computed tomography scanners are available in many of the training centers. 116 (99.1%) of the residents believed that there is a need for subspecialization in the subregion.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the need for subspecialization in West Africa. To achieve this goal, collaboration and support from well-established radiology residency and fellowship training programs based in developed countries is necessary.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1. Gay SB, Resnik CS, Harolds JA, Yousem DM, Lemley DE. The radiology fellowship and fellowship match: Current status. Acad
Radiol 2003;10:303‑8.
2. Sunshine JH, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M. Diagnostic radiologists’ subspecialization and the new final board examination. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 2008;191:1293‑301.
3. Taveras JM. Development of the first fellowship training program in neuroradiology in North America. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1991;12:587‑90.
4. Sunshine JH, Simon C, Busheé GR, Schepps B. 1997 Graduates Speak: Initial employment experiences of residency and fellowship
graduates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1225‑32.
5. Brogdon BG, Herbert DE. The fellowship phenomenon. Invest Radiol 1991;26:1032‑3.
6. Deitch CH, Chan WC, Sunshine JH, Shaffer KA. Profile of U.S. radiologists at middecade: Overview of findings from the 1995
survey of radiologists. Radiology 1997;202:69‑77.
7. Goodman CJ, Lindsey JI, Whigham CJ, Robinson A. Diagnostic radiology residents in the classes of 1999 and 2000: Fellowship and
employment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1211‑3.
8. Baker SR, Barry M, Chaudhry H, Hubbi B. Women as radiologists: Are there barriers to entry and advancement? J Am Coll Radiol
2006;3:131‑4.
9. Adeyekun AA. Residents’ perception of postgraduate radiology training in Nigeria. West Afr J Med 2010;29:314‑7.
10. Rabinowitz DA, Pretorius ES. Postgraduate radiology training in sub‑Saharan Africa: A review of current educational resources.
Acad Radiol 2005;12:224‑31.
11. Roberfroid D, Leonard C, Stordeur S. Physician supply forecast: Better than peering in a crystal ball? Hum Resour Health 2009;7:10.